Replica Computer Collecting

As computer technology powers ahead, people look back with nostalgia on the earlier models that they used, so the time is ripe for the production of small scale replicas for collection and display. Of course, being computers, they might do a little more than just look good. Building in a chip holding information about the model, and a wifi capability, would enable it to display its details on a local screen; and, depending on the particular selection of models that you have collected together, particular functions and processes could be programmed to occur. For example, the display of footage of an early computer guru speaking, the ability to pay an early game, or the ability to undertake the next stage of a complex puzzle.

Paper Unpublished but Complete

The reworked paper was sent to the International Journal of Information Management and a reply was received in April 2013 with comments from two reviewers, one of which recommended acceptance and the other recommending a number of changes prior to acceptance. Unfortunately, Tom’s workload has precluded him working on the paper over the summer and, with the new academic year about to start, he has advised that he is unlikely to be able to spend any time on it for some time. Therefore, I have taken into account the reviewer’s comments as best I can, and have produced a final unpublished version which is available at this link [Comms Comparison Paper Final Unpublished v1.0 16Sep2013]. The paper does do what I had hoped it would, and, even though it is not published, I’m pleased with the result and shall include it in the list of my articles, papers and books. It was a good experience working with Tom and it demonstrated that such a collaboration is feasible and can work for someone in my position. With that, this particular journey is now complete.

BIT collection given to Buckingham University Technical College

The advert for my collection of BIT journals went in the July edition of The Ergonomist and read as follows: “If you’d like to own the entire set of Behaviour & Information Technology Journal from Volume 1 (1982) – Volume 31 (2012) this is your chance. The collection is free to any individual or organisation that would like to give them a home. If you’re interested contact Paul Wilson at pwilsonofc@btinternet.com or phone on 01296-488-066”. However, it failed to produce any responses, so I finally asked the Aylesbury Reference Library if they might be interested. They weren’t – but gave me the phone number of the new Buckingham University Technical College based on the Aylesbury College campus on Oxford Road and opening this month. I duly phoned and was put in touch with Toby Payne, Head of Science, who was keen to have them. I delivered them earlier today – but discovered in the course of packing them that the following issues were missing in the otherwise complete collection from inception of the journal in 1982 to the end of 2012:

  • 1984, Vol 3, Numbers 3 and 4
  • 1985, Vol 5, Number 3
  • 1990, Vol 9, Number 3

I’m hoping the missing issues might be in one of the four boxes of papers I have yet to scan, and, if I do so, I’ll take them along to Toby to complete the set.

Ironically, after I got home from delivering the journals, I found an email from an Institute of Ergonomics member in Nigeria asking if they could have the journals…. an extraordinary coincidence!

My conclusion from all this is that demand for hardcopy journals is probably reducing substantially – but there are still some people out there who can find a use for them.

Reasons for Keeping Hardcopy

I’ve been doing some preliminary practical work for the study of ‘the artefact in the digital age’ that I’m doing with Ann O’Brien. To gain an idea of the range of reasons for keeping hardcopy rather than just having a digitised version, I’ve reviewed the 357 items that I have chosen to keep rather than scan and throw away. Nineteen categories emerged. Ann and I will use this initial insight to plan in detail the practical work I am going to do in scanning four boxes of material that have not yet been scanned.

Underwater Treasure Hunts

When I swim I enjoy going underwater and sometimes picking things up from the bottom. The other day it occurred to me that, by integrating some electronics and chips into the tiles on the bottom of a pool, it might  be possible to make them light up and to switch them off with a touch. This ability would enable a challenging underwater treasure hunt to be constructed. Tiles could be lit singly such that a new one is lit when the current one is touched. Alternatively, the lights could show numbers such that you have to switch them off in the correct order. Software would enable courses of differing tile placement but with the same length routes, to be constructed such that individuals could compete to get the fastest time.

Some professional input

My Memento Management activities have been interrupted for the past few months by an all-consuming effort to produce a Photo Book for my mother on her 90th birthday. I’ve just completed that, so aim to get back to Memento Management forthwith! Coincidentally, I’ve just listened to a TED Talk by Paola Antonelli, New York’s Museum of Modern Art’s senior curator, describing how she is acquiring video games as examples of interactive art, and how she goes about displaying them. Her motivation and philosophy is highly relevant to the notion of why and how to keep and display things. I shall revisit the talk some time in the future.

Today I have also emailed a contact in the Archiving field provided me by my good friend Robin Scott. The lady concerned is the Archivist for a stately home, and I’m hoping that she will be prepared to talk to me about how archiving is done professionally.

The T&F App

Over the last few days, I’ve been conducting an email correspondence with Taylor & Francis (T&F) about their iPhone and Tablet App.  The App seems to be primarily to enable people to search for, and save, selected papers to their mobile device and to be able to read them offline. T&F’s Alerting functionality is not included in the App. The App is activated by using a code to pair it with one’s username on the main T&F website, however, I’m having problems doing that – the App won’t accept the code I’ve been provided with. In the course of speaking to the Help Desk to resolve this issue, I’ve also started a conversation with the App’s development team who are apparently keen to hear about user requirements and behaviours. I’ll report on the App’s capabilities, and on what its like to read a paper on the iPhone, once I get my device pairing problem sorted.

Free – a hardcopy set of BIT!

Yesterday I completed the process of ensuring that I have electronic copies of all the papers for which I have made an entry in my index, and set about trying to find a home for my hardcopy collection. I first emailed a colleague to give him first refusal, but he already has access to a set. So I sent in a small advert for The Ergonomist – the monthly magazine issued by the Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors. I’ll have to wait and see if anyone still wants hardcopy now that electronic documents and communication are firmly established in the world at large.

Reading papers – single or several?

I’ve just been catching up on three weeks of BIT Alert emails (3 new volumes and four new paper online alerts) which I haven’t been able to deal with due to other priorities. I’ve found it hard work to deal with the whole volumes – particularly those which include several papers I’m interested in and need to read and digest; and which had been received prior to  me getting Alerts. My rather obvious conclusion is that I would far rather receive the Alerts prior to publication so that dealing with a whole volume is essentially just a checking affair to match up the papers with what I had already dealt with via the Alerts. Having said that if there are several papers that I’m interested in in a single Alert the effect is just the same – its hard work going through several papers in a single session. As with most things, its easier to do things as they occur rather than dealing with a backlog. So I would prefer an Alert to be about a single paper and for it to be sent out immediately it is available for issue, rather than accumulating a number of papers for inclusion in a single Alert message. Having said that there are probably some people who would prefer to work the other way. Perhaps users should be given the option to choose their preferred way of working.

Memento metamorphosis

On our recent weekend in Zurich, I saw teacups doubling as lampshades and open books hanging as mobiles from string threaded through holes bored through the pages. Both made me think how everyday objects can be given other contexts and uses which, conversely, makes their own essence more noticeable. I wondered if this might be a way of bringing some of those buried mementos and artefacts to life? Would it work, for example, to create a mobile with some of one’s keepsakes?